Pro Terrorist Torture

September 11, 2001, is a atomic number 42 frozen in conviction. It was on this twenty-four hour period t lid the introduction proposemed to stop turning, and its course would neer be the same again. It was the daylight of the largest nonionized t mavin-beginning on American citizens that took the lives of 2,976 honest e preciseday peck (attention grabber). It non however destroyed buildings, it destroyed lives. non only when the exonerated lives of the thousands murdered in the zealous buildings were destroyed, only if the lives of their families were destroyed, and their hearts became filled with price and loss.As a result of this unthinkable attack on our awk contendd, the lives of thousands of American Soldiers and their families would soon be affected as well The fight that 9/11 spun Americans and the rest of the world into was non a regular struggle in a regular region with regular soldiers. This fight was one in which our brave work force and wo hands t ook on a radical ghost resembling band of sc beists who obliterate in caves, hide behind women and nestlingren, and thrash wash kayoeds to themselves on the button to harm and terrorize some others.These people continue to threaten American guard and liberty each and every day and were responsible for the most railway lineshed on American soil in a single act of warfargon. These people neediness nonhing more(prenominal) than to harm innocent people and their families and provide stop at nothing to do so. So when these terrorists who feign no uniforms and claim no physical structure politic argon captured, some argue that they be to be treated hu universeely. The fact is, they dedicate information that could save thousands of American lives.However, they atomic number 18 so passionate about their make believe much(prenominal) information is not tardily obtained. Therefore, the United States has the redress to torment prisoners of war (suspected terrorists) in order to acquire merry information that is required to protect our sylvan and its citizens. Terrorists atomic number 18 not regular soldiers in a regular war. They do not counterbalance merit prisoner of war (prisoner of war) position as decl atomic number 18d by the geneva regulation passed by the United Nations and approve by the controlling Court.Colin Powell stated that bestowing POW status on detainees who do not meet the clear requirements of the geneva Convention would undermine the rule of law bragging(a) equal protections and privileges to all combatants regardless to their mention to the law. This is not a regular war because we argon not fighting against a country we are fighting religious extremists. Terrorists are not part of an unionised military, devour no uniforms, and do not represent a country or legitimate state, and thitherfore, are not saved nor deserved to be rotected under the Geneva Convention. Despite the agreed Geneva Convention, this nine-y ear war has resulted in different opinions on how communications protocol should be run halfway crosswise the globe in our country. A very prominent issue between politicians nowadays is the issue of straining. Torture sounds like a horrible word, and when spoken the thought of cruel treatment, pain, and misery come to mind. But in that respect are different forms and types of badgering that are not so cruel.The United States has been accuse of using a form of extort on suspected terrorists inha musical compositionn as stress and duress. But this form of torture is, as defined by the Supreme Court, neither inappropriate nor brutal by any means. (establish credibility/ source 2, reference supreme court) Stress and duress is a form of torture that includes psychological and physiological pressure on suspects through methods such as sleep deprivation, covering passing with hood to cause disorientation, and pinning prisoners in uncomfortable positions for hours. This is consi dered a form of torture.It is woeful to think that American citizens who are more worried about organism politically correct than the safety of our country and their friends and neighbors are speaking out against these insignificant pushes that soldiers fulfill on prisoners of war. Videos come out from Iraq and Afghanistan of terrorists soft cutting off the heads of our brave men and women protecting license. It is odd to think that terrorists behead and inhumanely devour and murder our soldiers and there is fuss when our soldiers keep a terrorist with American blood on his hands disadvantaged of sleep for a week.It is nice to know that our country still cares about and supports our men and women in uniform. As stated by a poll conducted by Rasmussen (source 3) 58% of U. S. voters say water boarding and other aggressive interrogation techniques should be use to gain information from the terrorist who attempted to bomb an airline on Christmas Day. (Rasmussen) T hat means that over half of our nation supports interrogation methods that are more unrelenting than the methods that others in this country are upset about.Also, the military is not torturing terrorists just to torture them because they do not like them or want r eventidege. Terrorists are be tortured for information such as future plots, hiding places, sources of weapons, etcetera that is take to simply protect our men and women afield and our citizens who call this great country home. some opposition goes so far as to demand American rights for terrorists who want to kill Americans and who hate this country.A Counsel member for tender-hearted Rights Watch, Katherine Bierman, (cite source 4) is quoted saying If youre pass to sentence them, there has to be a mediocre trial this amounts to nothing more extravagant than giving the applyant the line up to defend himself, not forcing him to incriminate himself and insuring hes not tortured the elements of what an general citizen would con sider a fair trial. (quoted in Katel 6) There are many shivery and utterly ridiculous elements in this quote.First, as established above, torture is not world used on suspected terrorists they are using stress and duress to evoke information. Secondly, terrorists openly express their hate for this country and say they are proud of their actions none have incriminated themselves by nothing more than the truth. A terrorist is not going to brusquely admit to something he/she did not do, even if he was severely tortured which they are not. Government documentation, the definition of the word torture, and 58% of our nation can prove that. Not to mention, a trial is costly.To fly a terrorist to our country to have a supposed fair trial is ridiculous and cost the people of this nation hard get money to have this man put up on trial. Not only is it costly, but it brings him/her into the country that his leading and fellow terrorists spilt blood in. It is not only ethically nonsensi cal to pay American money for these terrorists to have American rights it is unconstitutional to not face someone a fair trial. sight someone realistically say that a terrorist will receive a fair trial in the country he tried to commit terrorist acts against?What jury of American citizens would find this man innocent? What say will set him free? And even if by some horrible miracle this manslayer is set free- what happens to him? Does he freely notch our streets, or do our citizens spend further more money to fly this man linchpin home so he can go back to plotting against us? Finally these are not universal citizens, let alone even citizens. By no means does a external murderer against our citizens get the luxury of the rights he would have if he were a citizen.As stated by an American General Tommy Franks (source citation) , I dont want a soldier when he kicks down a door in a hut in Afghanistan searching for Osama bin slopped to have to worry about whether when he doe s so and questions the individuals he finds inside who whitethorn or may not be bin Ladens body guards, or even the individual himself- hes got to advise them of their rights before he takes a statement (quoted in Katel 6). If you are intentionally inflicting pain on someone, thence you are torturing them period, (Masci 5) Human Rights leaders declare.But the politically correct opposition fails to memorize the definition of pain. Pain is defined in the dictionary as (source dictionary) the acutely acerb physical discomfort experienced by somebody who is violently struck, injured, or ill. When a linebacker sacks the quarterback in a football game and puts the quarterback out of the game for a little bit with a rolled ankle, did he torture him? Or when children are playing craft ball at school and a child is given a bloody(a) nose, did the child who threw it torture the other child? Absolutely not. My point?Torture is inhumane treatment that causes severe and some measures immu table damage to another human being through psychological threats and physical beatings, not by sleep deprivation. There is a difference between torture and inhumane treatment. Causing someone stress or discomfort is not torture. Terrorists are a serious threat to our nation, citizens, beliefs, and safety. They do not deserve our rights, trials, and should be tortured by means of stress which is considered humane. The United States will not stoop to our enemys level and cruelly and brutally torture our prisoners of war.The time of war is not the time to be politically correct, but the time to take a step back and look at the big picture, the one in which our country has the right to freedom win the war on terror so the world will be a safer place. It is up to us to view as and protect our freedom and safety. These are the facts, and these are the views of opinions from both sides of this fragile issue. Now you know, and it is heavy as American citizens to be aware and aware so we can elite people that will do the right thing in our eyes and defend freedom in the way you see it best.Works Cited Barber, Ben. The POW Predicament. The American Legion. 1Aug. 2002(pg 1). career and Technical Education,ProQuest. Canyon Ridge advanced School Library. 17 Feb. 2010. < http//proquest. umi. com Katel, Peter, and Kenneth Jost. Treatment of Detainees. CQ tec 16 29 (25 Aug 2006) 673-696. (pg6) CQ Researcher Online. 17 Feb. 2010 . Masci, David, and Patrick Marshall. Civil Liberties in Wartime. CQ Researcher 11 43 (14 Dec 2001) 1017-1040. CQ Researcher. 17 Feb. 2010 . Masci, David. Torture. CQ Researcher. 13 15 (18 April 2003) 345-368. (pg 3, 4,5) CQ Researcher. 17 Feb. 2010. http//library. cqpress. com/cqresearcher/cqresrre2003041800